East Los Angeles deputies shot and killed 21-year-old Anthony Vargas Sunday morning at approximately 2 a.m. after allegedly committing an armed robbery, running from deputies and brandishing a handgun during a fight with them.
His mother, however, says he was a good boy who had been attending a birthday party and Bible study. They claim they have already hired a lawyer to investigate or sue the county.
It appears what happened is deputies had responded to the area regarding an armed robbery call. Another assisting unit on the way to the call saw Vargas, who matched the suspect description. A short pursuit ensued, followed by a struggle. During the struggle, Vargas reportedly tried to “arm himself”, according to Homicide Lt. Derrick Alfred.
A handgun was recovered at the scene and one deputy suffered minor injuries during the fight.
According to radio traffic (click here and skip to 5:40 in), the initial armed robbery incident occurred at Hammel Street and Mednik Avenue. The deputy-involved shooting occurred about two blocks away. We were unable to locate radio traffic of the shooting itself, but traffic of a deputy-involved fight in East LA could be heard around 12:10 into the recording above.
The Los Angeles Times has published four hard-hitting articles in the last three days taking examining misconduct by Los Angeles County deputy sheriffs, taking square aim at changing California’s police officer privacy laws.
LASD.News’ Opinion: We don’t know whether officer privacy laws / the Peace Officer Bill of Rights needs to be changed or not. As easy as it is to get information about people these days, and with a bloody history of officers being followed or confronted at their homes, there are certainly safety reasons to preserve POBR.
While the Times has identified many cases of real or alleged misconduct it would have liked to know about, and defense attorneys would have liked to know about–we don’t think it has established that the prior misconduct was actually relevant in the subsequent cases. For example, in the first story, the Times cites many lawyers and criminal suspects who would have been glad to use the deputy’s prior misconduct to angle for a lighter sentence or dismissal, when their actual guilt and the evidence in their cases does not seem to be in doubt.
As a journalistic and opinionated outfit ourselves, we understand the Times’ desire for access to officer personnel files. (Are journalists offering up their personnel files, too? Will LASD “executives” be wearing body cams?) But we are not yet convinced that the desired transparency will benefit anyone other than reporters who want to tell interesting stories, criminals who want to get out of jail, and the defense attorneys who want to help them. We look forward to the Times’ editorial board’s big reveal as to what exactly they are proposing.
Everyone makes mistakes in their life and career. While police officers have tremendous public trust placed in them and misconduct should be dealt with, criminals and their attorneys are looking for whatever will establish reasonable doubt in the least intelligent member of a jury. Or suggest to a busy deputy district attorney that a slam-dunk case will become a hassle and should be dismissed or pled.
Allowing criminals, defense attorneys and reporters to go on fishing expeditions through officers’ past and cherry-pick tidbits that benefit their own agendas will have many consequences which should be fiercely debated.
Update @ 08-11-18 / 0015 Hrs: Radio traffic from this incident can be found here: first clip (begins at 28 min in); incident continues in this second clip. We’re left with two thoughts: first, this sounds like an absolute Donnybrook in the station jail. Second, check out these deputies (and one in particular) taking control of the situation and handling it. THIS is the difference between LASD and LAPD. Not to pick a fight, but while LAPD is all about rank and process and systems of accountability (blah, blah, blah), LASD is about ability, taking charge and getting the job done. And that is why you hear a deputy sheriff running the response here, not various levels of sergeant, lieutenant, captain, commander, chief and assistant sheriff stepping all over themselves over who is in command. Despite everything corrupt and broken and wrong with the leadership of today’s LASD, this radio traffic gives us confidence the beating heart of the real LASD is still alive (for now). The deputy sheriff, handling business.
* * *
A Custody Assistant at Lakewood Sheriff Station was savagely beaten by an arrestee today as the jailer was attempting to fingerprint him.
The suspect had been arrested around 1300 hours for possession of a stolen car (10851 CVC).
After booking was completed, he was of course removed from his cell to be fingerprinted by the Custody Assistant (jailer).
The jailer’s partner had just left the jail to deal with some paperwork and was elsewhere in the station, so the jailer was alone. This is very common.
While he was being fingerprinted, the suspect (who we understand to be Pacific Islander, possibly Samoan), suddenly, without provocation and savagely beat the female jailer.
The jailer was able to hit a panic button, setting off an alarm. Lakewood Station dispatch personnel saw what was happening on CCTV and sent deputies to help.
The suspect stole the jailer’s Taser and dragged her into a cell by her hair, locking it behind him. Legally this was a kidnapping. He then essentially held her hostage in the cell.
Once deputies arrived, the suspect points the Taser at them through the jail screen, as well as reportedly at the jailer being held hostage. The jailer had been beat to a pulp and could have been killed, so deadly force was clearly authorized.
One or more deputies then shot the suspect. We understand the shooting was directed by the watch commander, though the deputies had cause to shoot without that (at least under current California law…). The suspect was hit several times but still did not immediately give up until he was subsequently Tased.
The suspect is in critical condition as of this article.
The jailer was savagely beat, with a broken orbital and nose, but should survive.
We will not release the name of the jailer or other involved personnel.
This article will be updated as we learn more information (which does not compromise the investigation).
Struggling Sheriff Jim McDonnell flashed the anger, contempt and casual relationship with the truth he is known for Wednesday in responding to LASD’s largest union endorsing his challenger, retired Lieutenant Alex Villanueva.
I’m not surprised by the announcement made by the Board of Directors of ALADS today. By endorsing my opponent, ALADS has endorsed a candidate who has publicly opposed the reforms underway that have reduced jail violence and increased accountability. He would take the Department backwards to a time of chaos and corruption like it was under Baca and Tanaka.
I have come in and implemented accountability measures and the ALADS Board has taken issue with that, and I am not going to apologize for holding accountable those who tarnish the badge.
What an astonishingly passive-aggressive, dishonest, bridge-burning, and childish bunch of nonsense. Had ALADS endorsed him, McDonnell would’ve instead been talking about how honored and humbled he was for their support and partnership.
In other words: you don’t think I’m doing awesome so you’re part of the problem.
This sort of denial and blame-shifting wouldn’t be tolerated of a deputy sheriff trainee in the academy; we absolutely shouldn’t tolerate it from the elected sheriff. He’s had four years to learn our standards. This is Phase 1 roll-up behavior.
Is it any wonder McDonnell’s community relations are so fraid? That he was absent from much of the community for the last four years until, surprised into a runoff, he’s running around hat-in-hand, begging for money from wealthy West Siders? That he views the Citizens Oversight commission as his liaison to the community rather than an actual oversight panel?
Petulant as McDonnell’s statement is, it’s a window into how his Father Knows Best mindset reacts when a partner dares to challenge him. No wonder suck-ups and sycophants have done so well promoting under McDonnell, especially all the Tanaka-acolytes who so quickly changed their colors?
McDonnell’s statement is completely unhinged.
Here are the facts:
Jim McDonnell has accomplished very little in four years as sheriff. Crime is up, proactive police work is way down, morale is probably the lowest its ever been, chancing arbitrary and career-altering/ending discipline by ambitious middle-managers and self-styled “executives” is viewed as a risk of showing up for work, acting with integrity is viewed as an act of foolishness, while the executive ranks themselves are riddled with suck ups and people with extensive records of misconduct (some quite recent).
Alex Villanueva hasn’t opposed significant reforms because McDonnell has neither made significant reforms nor even suggested what they might be. All he talks about is implementing systems of processes of layers of paper-pushers (all wearing brass belt buckles and sewn-down epaulettes, of course; all telling him how great he is). And this is without even getting to the 300 admin staff he says he’d need to run a body cam program.
In fact, the only major McDonnell “reform” LASD.News can recall Villanueva opposing was releasing an informal list of deputies previously accused of having integrity issues to the District Attorney’s office (the so-called “Brady List”), including its apparently intentional and criminal leak to the media. And the reason Villanueva has given for disagreeing is not that he opposes the list in principle but because the list is not accurate–it includes people who don’t even know they’re on it or why they would be; it includes people who were bullied into accepting a punishment that without their knowledge landed them on the list rather than risk loss of pay while fighting an internal case; indeed the Los Angeles Times has itself reported that deputies have been removed from the list after someone realized they were there in error. That McDonnell is comfortable needlessly and perhaps falsely tarnishing peoples’ reputations to achieve the appearance of having achieved something says more about him than it does about anyone else.
Actually, Villanueva has campaigned extensively on the assertion that McDonnell’s reforms have been fake in effect, not that they’ve been wrong in intent.
Indeed, under McDonnell’s leadership numerous deputies have been arrested or convicted of crimes, firings have gone through the roof (as have reinstatements through the legal system and back-pay awards), including firings of “executives” McDonnell sought to defend one day and kicked out the window the next. As any deputy knows, firing is viewed internally now as a management stunt easily and often entered into to make the lawyers happy and “leaders” look good, with the understanding that the legal appellate process will do the actual managing.
By the way, anyone know what’s going on with Todd Rogers’ civil suit against McDonnell alleging he was retaliated against after the last election? Did the County settle that one yet?
And speaking of integrity issues, what does it take for McDonnell to end up on his own Brady List, with all his own false statements? Such as when he told the media last year that no uses of force had been recorded on deputies’ personally-owned body cams (which they have bought due to his refusal to distribute them)? Or his claiming above that an “overwhelming number of deputies” support him in “moving the Department forward” when, in fact, 97% of deputies voted their lack of confidence in McDonnell? Or his many false statements to reporter Annie Gilbertson in her REPEAT Podcast (especially episodes 5 and 6)? He must know what he is saying is false, but he’s saying it so his LA-establishment backers who don’t know how failed and unpopular he is, who will simply take his word for it.
McDonnell’s attitude–and that of his supporters–seems to be that if the unions disapprove of his performance, he must be doing something right. That’s cute, except LASD’s unions endorsed him four years ago and have complained constantly since then not about McDonnell’s policy positions but mostly about his lack of vision, understanding of the organization, and his leadership. They’ve complained about his not responding when a deputy was shot in the neck because it was late at night. They’ve complained about his ineffectiveness; about his inability to recruit, about the wave of deputies immediately lateraling to other agencies, about being $200 million over budget, about detectives being put into patrol cars to achieve minimum patrol levels. The unions are raising serious concerns about a sheriff which experience is showing is not up to the job. (See, also.) You can ignore the warning light if you like, but that doesn’t mean you aren’t going to crash into the mountain.
Maybe this frequent commenter on the LA Times article summed it up best:
“I think Jim is the biggest let-down of ANY elected official in the last 25 years,” she said. “Now even I refer to Jim as Sheriff McBuckles. Sad. So disappointing. Jim, I hate to say this b/c I was such a huge fangurl, you had your chance and choked. Time to step aside my friend.”
The Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs (ALADS) dropped a bombshell Wednesday when it announced it had endorsed Alex Villanueva to be the next Los Angeles County Sheriff.
The endorsement mirrors a similar situation in Riverside County, where strong support from the deputies’ union allowed Lieutenant Chad Bianco to force unpopular Sheriff Stan Sniff into a fall runoff. Like the LASD, Riverside Sheriffs are also dealing with historically low morale, a sense the department is mismanaged at every level, a lack of progressive thinking, and an inability to recruit or retain deputies headed for early retirement or greener pastures at other agencies. They, too, are a mess. And their union has taken a similarly strong stand to bring about reform.
In an email to deputies, ALADS President Ron Hernandez explained, “Alex is one of us… He has been a tireless advocate for deputies, especially during moments in the department’s history when it was necessary to speak truth to those in power. Alex’s track record demonstrates an ability to initiate reform while staying acutely connected to our needs and experiences. His impressive primary election campaign has already shown how he can raise morale, inspire and represent us.”
The endorsement comes after 97% of deputy sheriffs voted no confidence in McDonnell in a survey earlier this year. Only 34 of the over 1,400 deputies responding to the survey felt confident in McDonnell’s leadership.
“The underlying sentiments which drove responses should certainly be of concern to Sheriff McDonnell,” ALADS said at the time. “In particular, the Sheriff should take note that this vote represents a loss of confidence in him by a significant number of his deputies.”
The endorsement also comes after a primary election in which McDonnell, who won 75% of the vote less than four years ago, couldn’t muster more than 48%, despite huge name recognition, rock-solid establishment support, conventional wisdom you cannot beat an incumbent, the endorsement of the Los Angeles Times, and a half-million dollars in fundraising (mostly from wealthy West LA/Beverly Hills types–the same trough he’s going back to now in the general election).
It also comes after Villanueva pulled in over 30% of the vote, despite little name recognition, virtually no budget or campaign machine like those fielded by challenger Bob Lindsey and incumbent McDonnell. Rather, what Villanueva offered was the assertion that McDonnell’s reform was fake and impermanent and the view that it was possible to chart a progressive vision for Southern California law enforcement in a way that also supports the men and women placing themselves in harm’s way.
The early and strong endorsement is especially noteworthy given ALADS’ declining to make an endorsement in the primary election (while the deputy sheriff contract was under negotiation) and given the significant resources that will now be made available to Villanueva.
While McDonnell’s support was strongest among wealthier, white, establishment types, Villanueva found strong support among African Americans, Hispanics, and those with whom LASD’s relationship is supposedly most strained.
Now that ALADS has endorsed Villanueva, you can expect many other Southern California labor unions to follow suit, due to an unwritten rule that they tend to follow the lead of the largest union at each organization. The endorsement also signals that ALADS may use its significant political budget to advocate for Villanueva.
Here is ALADS’ statement in full:
Today we have announced our endorsement of Alex Villanueva in the November 2018 election for Los Angeles County Sheriff. He embodies the essential characteristics and values required to lead the department: integrity, honesty, tenacity, courage, and connectivity with his fellow deputies.
This decision comes after serious deliberation amongst our Board of Directors and numerous conversations with you – the members whom we represent and serve. It is our firm belief that the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department needs to be transformed and that Alex is best suited to lead that change given his background, skills, and character.
Alex is one of us. He has over three decades of experience as a deputy, has served in the United States Air Force and the California Army National Guard, and earned a Doctorate in Public Administration while studying the impact of diversity on law enforcement leadership. He has been a tireless advocate for deputies, especially during moments in the department’s history when it was necessary to speak truth to those in power.
Alex’s track record demonstrates an ability to initiate reform while staying acutely connected to our needs and experiences. His impressive primary election campaign has already shown how he can raise morale, inspire and represent us.
Please feel free to contact any of your board representatives if you have any questions or concerns.
The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department was one of the first agencies in America to try out body cameras–and will be one of the last to adopt them. And not for good reasons.
Now, the Board of Supervisors is set to vote Tuesday on–by our count–the fourth study (possibly the fifth?) on how LASD should implement in a cam program. This is pretty dysfunctional stuff, even by the County’s standards.
* * *
Agencies began snatching up the cameras four years ago in a mad dash to avoid being the next Ferguson. Many brands tried to capitalize on the gold rush: Vievu, Safariland, Wolfcom and, of course, Taser–which has since rebranded as Axon, bought Vievu, and seen its stock price soar from $8 or so pre-Ferguson to nearly $70 today.
The cameras, which were initially demanded by African American activists, liberal groups and the media and viewed warily by officers have now become popular with officers and deputies, with many buying their own. Meanwhile, the Movement for Black Lives (a policy-recommending group affiliated with Black Lives Matter) has called for the elimination of body cams, as part of what it views as a war on black people.
While many agencies nationwide hopped aboard the body cam bandwagon, Sheriff Jim McDonnell waited–and wisely, we think. There were still many different brands, the technology was rapidly evolving, and there were real unknowns about performance, policies, and long-term costs. Given LASD’s size, it was smart to make a deliberate choice–and, since the cams were a political demand, understandable he dragged his feet to get the Board of Supervisors to pay for them.
But that was almost four years ago.
Of course, McDonnell also wanted to use the body cams as a Trojan Horse for hiring nearly 240 new administrative people(plus another 60 at the DA and Public Defender’s offices). That’s two entire patrol stations…just in admin. Will body cams require people to process public record requests? Pull videos, blur faces, legal stuff and subpoenas? Sure. But 240? Ridiculous.
While the sheriff and Board of Supervisors have been playing hot-potato on the cameras for years, many deputies have gone out and bought their own cams, despite uncertainty re how the Department will view their recordings or whether opportunistic/low-integrity managers will punish them for infractions on the recordings the Department never would have known about without high-integrity deputies recording themselves. What a sorry state of affairs…
The cams will get delivered, sit in a warehouse for a while, and it’ll take months (maybe years) to for people to get off their asses and issue them, set up the necessary docks and chargers and wifi hotspots, etc, etc, etc. (Of course, it could all get done in like a week, but that ain’t the County Way–not when making it all happen can justify entire jobs and enough overtime for a thousand trips to the river!)
That’s what’s going to happen. So we might as well get on with it.
What we’re really looking forward to is the sheriff and brass having to wear the cams, in all their closed-door meetings, where they talk about things deputies and the public didn’t until now have the ability to know. You know, for transparency, right?
The LA Times is out with another story this weekend about the discovery of yet another tattoo within the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department–this time on Deputy Oleg Polissky. As anyone who has worked with Oleg knows, he’s a great cop and human being: good person, strictly business, great tactics, and a great mentor. Here he is above handing stickers out to kids (wearing, by the way, his own personally-funded body cam due to Sheriff McDonnell’s four years of feet-dragging on providing them). With the sheriff Police Chief of LA County saying he needs 239 more new administrative jobs to manage a body cam program, it’s no wonder nothing’s gotten done.
Related: Here’s a story about the issue of personally-owned body cams from a year ago. Note the absurd lie that “Deputies in L.A. have never captured any use-of-force incidents…on personally owned body cameras, McDonnell said.” That’s nonsense, which McDonnell would know if he knew what was going on within his department–but he doesn’t. (Seeing a trend here?)
Anyhow, Oleg’s a great cop. And he’s got a tattoo, which he said in a recent deposition acquired by the Times was bestowed to him by his partners at Palmdale Station because he’s a great cop. We believe it.
While McDonnell took re-election for granted during the primary (having won 75% of the vote four years ago), he couldn’t even muster 49% this time ’round–with communities of color coming out strongly against him. Now desperate for re-election, he’s promising to investigate LASD’s tattoos, as if he’s shocked–shocked!–to learn there is gambling going on in this establishment!
For our money, we think ALADS President Ron Hernandez has it right when he told the Times, “I think the department should focus more on the value of a deputy’s work product.”
* * *
What’s really going on here?
Sheriff McDonnell has been claiming credit for turning LASD around for four years but, really, he hasn’t done much (other than destroying morale). And his confused response over this tattoo thing shows it: he says he’s single-handedly (like Moses!) engineered a sea change in the department, yet many deputies complain he’s never spent a single day working a custody block, or working a Sheriff’s Department patrol car, or understanding the culture and how it is different from the LAPD. He could have–four years ago–but he’s arrogant and thought he knew what he needed to know, so he didn’t. And now he’s left standing here like a dummy trying to explain paper over the difference between what he and his cheerleaders have been claiming and what the facts show to be true.
As for the tattoos themselves: look, LASD.News knows many deputies with tattoos. Most are great, some are zeroes who never should have been hired in the first place. Some are Department executives who are great, some are Department executives who never should have been hired (or promoted) in the first place. Focusing on the tattoos themselves isn’t helpful, but it can be a window into what is right or wrong with the culture and how the department is managed.
The reasons the tattoos are awarded are, as Polissky says, to be glue at the station-level for the standards the deputies there hold dear–beyond the lowest-common denominator behavior the Department as a massive bureaucracy must–or chooses–to tolerate. The tattoos are a way of the most respected deputies at a station inspiring people to do better than the department itself expects: “this is who we are and what we expect”. Can they be abused–or be a reward for misconduct? Absolutely, and they have been. But that is the exception, not the rule.
This is where knowing the organization and leadership come in. McDonnell doesn’t know and isn’t leading the Sheriff’s Department. He only knows what the ambitious or frightened “executives” around him tell him, and what he knows from LAPD. It’s the blind leading the ambitious or cowardly. LAPD may be a great organization in its own right, but it isn’t better than or all that comparable to the LASD. It’s not Coke and Pepsi (and, in fact, they too are very different kinds of organizations).
Rather than earning the organization’s trust four years ago or since then, McDonnell has promoted dozens of Yes Men and Women who will enforce what he tells them to do. From his perspective, that makes sense after the chain of command was so broken under Sheriff Baca and Undersheriff Tanaka. But what he doesn’t see is he’s just replaced their Kitchen Cabinet with his own and, if he he has no credibility with the deputies, and the Yes Men promoting through the organization don’t either (because they spent a minute or less in patrol, or because people know they disagree with the sheriff but aren’t allowed to say so by policy), then he isn’t leading anybody.
What McDonnell needed to do four years ago was work in custody, work in the field, get to know the people and the culture and the issues, and to lead from a position of credibility (not resume). And this would have allowed him to speak externally about what was going on, as well as to say internally, “Hey, I know you’re doing this, and I understand it, but I am asking you to stop, or to stay within these guardrails, because it’s unhelpful to us in this way…” or whatever. McDonnell could have led. He refused. And here we are: four years down the pike, nothing to show for it.
LASD needs a sheriff that understands the organization, what needs to change, what doesn’t, how change can be achieved, and has a vision for the future.